Innovate Without Security Friction

Integrate Automated Security Reviews into CI/CD Pipelines to Speed Delivery

Watch Demo

Shorten Cloud Security Reviews from Weeks to Seconds

Large enterprises have spent years and millions of dollars to automate and transform software development practices into agile workstreams that continuously deliver releases in short sprints. In stark contrast, security predominantly relies on manual processes and reviews that take weeks or months to complete.

Remove cloud security friction

Concourse instantiates security and control objectives in code, automating security reviews of Infrastructure-as-Code such as Terraform and CloudFormation files. This shortens the review time to seconds and gives developers specific remediation guidance when violations are found. The result is developers can work largely unimpeded by security teams, confident that they are delivering code that is compliant with enterprise security standards.

use-case-graphic

Secure clouds without changing the developer experience

Identify security and compliance risks directly within existing CI/CD tools and processes. Native API integration of policies into popular CI/CD tools creates seamless security and compliance guardrails.

Concourse in Action

Test Terraform Plan changes to prevent risks from being deployed and evaluate deployed resources in Terraform State to detect violations within configured resources and their dependencies.

use-case-screen

Deliver Compliant Infrastructure Code Without Becoming a Security Expert

The vast majority of cloud security breaches are a result of misconfiguration. Developers building cloud applications typically create Infrastructure-as-Code to automate configuration and operations. If there are security flaws in this infrastructure code, the flaws are spread automatically.

Yet most developers are not security experts. How do developers know what security standards to implement? How do they learn how to implement them? How will they know how to remediate problems? And how do they do all this in an environment that is constantly changing? Concourse solves these problems.

Get automated security guardrails

Spend more time coding and zero time trying to determine which compliance policies to check. Industry standards and internal controls for security, resiliency and regulatory compliance are preassigned to pipelines, prior to code being committed.

Concourse in Action

Easily assign security policy or policy groups to pipeline definitions with attribute tags. Once Security or DevSecOps teams assign a tag(s), it persistently stays with a resource regardless of where that resource is deployed within a cloud topology, thus ensuring all applicable policies are consistently checked.

use-case-screen

Separate Policy Lifecycles from Application Lifecycles

Manage and evolve policies independent of the code to ensure cloud application risk assessments automatically keep pace with new threat vectors and regulatory compliance changes, without changing the code.
use-case-screen

Know Infrastructure-as-Code is compliant before it is released

Accelerate secure application delivery with automated testing of complex infrastructure-as-code templates. Eliminate dangerous misconfigurations hiding below the root stack, within nested or parent stacks, and ensure delivery of compliant code.

Concourse in Action

Evaluate nested templates as a complete set to speed up security reviews and detect violations that result from interactions between different infrastructure attributes.

use-case-screen

Get actionable guidance for fast cloud risk remediation

Compliant infrastructure code proceeds through the pipeline normally. Developers are notified of policy violations and given specific remediation guidance. All fixes are automatically re-tested. Developers spend more time innovating and less time seeking help from security teams, trying to understand security standards and documenting compliance reports and artifacts.

Concourse in Action

Get security feedback directly within existing CI/CD toolsets, including pass/fail results, the exact policies violated and non-compliant resources and what specifically must be changed.

use-case-screen
Upward Arrow